Undoing the Reformation

By Curtis Rittenour | Posted October 30, 2017

Five hundred years ago, on October 31, 1517, a Roman Catholic monk named Martin Luther posted a list of challenges to the authority of his church’s leaders. The Protestant Reformation quickly blossomed from there. People soon had access to Bible truths in their own language.


The Reformation wasn’t without cost to the Roman Church. Less than two hundred years after Luther’s courageous act, in February 1798, French forces under the command of General Louis-Alexandre Berthier marched into Rome, entered Vatican City, and deposed Pope Pius VI. That capture was seen by many observers of prophecy as a “mortal wound” to the Catholic faith, but one from which it recovered over the ensuing 165 years.


Following the Second Vatican Council of the early 1960s, the Catholic Church made strenuous efforts to gain friends among Protestant churches. Outreaches by every pontiff since Pope Paul VI have increased with each passing year. Days after he became leader of the world’s Roman Catholics, Pope Francis invited Protestant leaders to meet him at the Vatican—and from the Church of England to The Salvation Army, those leaders came (p. 12, 13).


Now, a major U.S.-based Catholic publisher has released a volume claiming a reunification of Catholics and Protestants “will” be done. According to an announcement, Peter Kreeft, a leading Catholic thinker, claims the two sides “need to stop ‘directing arrows not against each other but against our own hearts and minds and wills.’ ”


What that appears to mean is that Kreeft wants people in both camps to drop their prejudices about the other. And, astonishingly, a leading Protestant academic appears to agree.


Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School of Samford University, said, in the same statement, that author Kreeft has “given us a passionate plea for Christian unity, one that builds upon the great common core of Christian belief confessed by faithful Protestants and Catholics alike.”


Of course, “faithful Protestants” who know their Bible reject many unbiblical doctrines of the Catholic church, so just how “great” this “common core of Christian belief” actually is may be subject to question.


The Bible’s last book Revelation reveals details about a religious deception that will unite an apostate “church” and the civil state in what will be an unholy alliance against those who hold fast to what the Bible teaches. Beginning on November 3, 2017, Pastor Doug Batchelor will address how the Protestant Reformation must continue during his live series called Foundations of Faith, which is designed to bring people back to the Bible as our primary source for faith, just as Luther did five hundred years ago.

Curtis Rittenour
Curtis J. Rittenour is the senior writer at Amazing Facts International. He pastored for 25 years and has authored books, magazine articles, blogs, and seminars.
Comments

When you post, you agree to the terms and conditions of our comments policy.

If you have a Bible question for Pastor Doug Batchelor or the Amazing Facts Bible answer team, please submit it by clicking here. Due to staff size, we are unable to answer Bible questions posted in the comments.
To help maintain a Christian environment, we closely moderate all comments.

  1. Please be patient. We strive to approve comments the day they are made, but please allow at least 24 hours for your comment to appear. Comments made on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday may not be approved until the following Monday.

  2. Comments that include name-calling, profanity, harassment, ridicule, etc. will be automatically deleted and the invitation to participate revoked.

  3. Comments containing URLs outside the family of Amazing Facts websites will not be approved.

  4. Comments containing telephone numbers or email addresses will not be approved.

  5. Comments off topic may be deleted.

  6. Please do not comment in languages other than English.

Please note: Approved comments do not constitute an endorsement by the ministry of Amazing Facts or by Pastor Doug Batchelor. This website allows dissenting comments and beliefs, but our comment sections are not a forum for ongoing debate.

Leave a Comment Below

Just leave your name and comment below. No need to create an account. All comments are moderated. Spam comments will not be approved.

4 Comments
Avatar Placeholder
Anonymous
Now I'm no fan of the beast, but please, take a look at the picture of Francis at the top of this article. Does the real Francis have "whites" of his eyes ? If so, then is it really fair to use an extra-sinister-looking picture of him where the whites of his eyes are practically indiscernable, so that his eyes look almost all black ?
Avatar Placeholder
Anonymous
I have to say, based on the "daughter-harlot" connotation the word "Protestant" has come to imply, I wish for the SDAs sake that they would distance themselves from the concept altogether. Yes, the SDAs want to be in the middle of the fight (based on Truth) against the Beast, making the SDAs one of the very few "church" groups willing to still "protest" as such. But isn't it a little late in the game for the SDAs to try to assume the "Protestant" mantle, especially since the word itself has now practically become synonymous with fraudulent religion ? Barring few exceptions (such as the not-too-long-ago anti-Biblical push for women's ordination), the SDAs do not look like, act like, or quack like today's version of that "Protestant" duck; so why try to now wear a duck outfit ? Because the word "Protestant" is going to become even more associated to apostasy now that today's "Protestant" churches are actually heading toward eventual unification with the mother harlot. Therefore, would it not be better to simply refer to yourselves as something else at this point ? Riding on those tattered coattails as a Johnny-come-lately (relatively speaking)... there has to be a better way to define the SDAs than that.
As for the rest of this comment, I do not expect this final part to be posted; it is only for your own interest based on this topic. It's a webpage in the format of a letter, and is in regard to where all the church-harlotry is headed. You might find it interesting... the webpage is: itscalledsin-dot-com/letter-8.html
Of course the "-dot-" part of that is just a period. I didn't want any automatic comment cleaners taking away the URL. That's it. Thanks.
Hide Replies 1
Avatar Placeholder
Anonymous
I would not be worried about using the word protestant, to use some other word would only serve to cause global confusion given the already universal acceptance of what protestant has meant within people who profess faith and also others. Precious time would be spent in explanation of a new term that would only be specific to SDA. The word still has meaning regardless of those who are no longer protesting the doctrine of the Roman Catholic apostate church. At every step Satan seeks to cause confusion and a new name would also be used to that effect. When we think that SDA's are also called Christians, should we also change this title because of apostate Christians calling themselves the same name.
Avatar Placeholder
carlos_valera
Can’t wait for the series to start! Prophecy is unfolding right before our eyes! How exciting to be so close to the second coming. Lord, wake us up to be ready to spread your message before time runs out.